Catholicism is based on the arrival of Jesus as Christ.
Now please do excuse me, I am not saying that I of all people
know Catholic origin more than Catholics do. But it is possible
to be a Jew and not know the origin of Jews, it is possible to be
Catholic and not know Catholic origin, it is possible to be any religion
and not know its origin. And as to whether i know origins, i will
say hey all of us have been born in the past 100 years,
what do any of us really know. Who can rise up above his
brother and say hey i was there.

So now my belief is to figure out and know Buddhist origin
based on the premise as fact that the world has always
looked for the next Leader. In this search for The Leader,
we have those who accepted Jesus as Christ and in doing
so a Roman empire who didnt like it. And so it is common
nonCatholic belief that Catholicism is not The Christians nor
acceptance of Christians so they can come forth out of
hiding and worship publicly but rather it was a Roman Church
created and set up to create a solution to their Christian
problem, that of creating a Church that works with Roman
government. In this way, rather than perceive me as pointing
out a wrong unchristian origin of this Church, do see my point
that they were accepting one fact (out of all christianity), the
fact that they could not stop people from believing Jesus was
The Christ. Now extend this to other nations who accept
someone else as The Christ.
Whether Mohammed intended or wanted to be The Christ,
he became accepted as being the arrival as the Year 6000
in the same way Magi claimed the birth of Jesus was that
6000 from Adam. And although he is called The Prophet, it is
the same as saying The Christ, because Prophet means The Word
as in word of God, of which we have John stating that from
the very beginnning Jesus has always been The Word.
So too, what then do we know of Buddha, was he the arrival of
Christ to these people. In all cases, calendar cycles (circle) or
the circle or cycle of the world was regarded as
new cycle = new world, and new world = christ

Buddha is dated to 544 BC... do we see the looking for christ
to savethe world. The answer is Yes. First we have the
1460-year Sothic cycle twice back to 3460 BC.
Jewish Josephus in 93 AD
uses this year as one of his two options as the Flood.
With calendars and astronomy he calculates an Adam
of 5716 BC (which Diocletian uses as year 6000 in
284 AD to become emperor for Jews and gains their favor
by killing Christians, think about that the next time
you hear about Catholics once killing Jews).
So Josephus then uses 2656 years to the Japanese year
3060 BC as the Flood, but can only list and account the
Septuagint figures for 2256 years to 3460 BC for Flood.
Note that Jospehus has the Buddha as Christ of 544 BC
to support his twice 1460 back to a 3460 BC Flood.
He then accounts for 892 years from 3060 BC Flood
to Abram, but this is 1292 from 3460 BC to Abram.
That 3460 BC Flood is thus a postFood year 950 to
Nimrod's birth as 2509 BC and he lives traditional Moslem
500 years to the Marduk Temple year of 2009 BC.
Here is where all this is miscalculated Josephus comes from
events of TRUTH.... Nimrod when he is 250 changes his name
from Narmer to become Menes when Noah dies at 950
in 2020 BC. Thus the idea of born or reborn with Year 950.
Almost all chronologies will claim that the rebirth in year 950
is his death, but few like this case with Josephus and Magi
see him born 950 years fater Flood, not dying then.
Those who see this rebirth as his death do so as year 3192
from Adam so that they choose 2309 BC or 2009 BC insisting
that Babel ruled 300 years just like Babylon ruled 300 years.
Truth- Babylon's 300 is 1894-1594 BC and because Ur fell in
1900 BC, Babylon's years were altered by 6 years as 1900-1600 BC.
Marduk Temple is 2009 BC but it is not year 950 which is 2020 BC;
those with a 5200 BC Adam make 2009 BC the year 950 and
as Adam's 3192. But Nimrod died at 500  (2270-1770 BC)
during Hamurabi because 1770 BC is the true year 2256 of Adam.
And the reviving of Marduk temple in 834 BC is the true year 3192
not 2009 BC. Both Josephus and the Jewish Seder Olam Rabbah
try to claim Marduk temple was built the same year as
Jerusalem's temple (original altar in Salem, and Solomon's temple
later on). This is based on spans of calendar as 936 years
or Jupiter's 996 years. So the Seder Olam says Solomon's temple
is 834 BC (the 480th from 1313 BC as Exodus) is also Marduk temple
counted as 936 years from Hamurabi's 1770 BC.
And then Josephus says the temple is 1073 BC because it is
936 years after 2009 BC. And so he says Solomon ruled
80 years because the temple cannot be the 4th year of David
who hasnt taken the city until his 7th year.

The whole point is the connection in astronomy, it shows no
preference to pagan or Jew or Catholic. The planets do not
move as a different choice for each religion, either the science
and calendars for these planets by these religions
are correct or not correct. And there is no way to see an asteroid
coming unless you begin to see real astronomy, again (as
it is a lost art of Noah and Shem). And so the fact exists that
Buddha is connected to a choice of 3460 BC as Flood.
Buut there are also in all cases connections to exact truth.
For example the marked year 2368 BC as the first new year
off the ark as Noah's 602 is 24x 76-year moon where 19 leap days
proves 4x 19 years = 19x 4 years will cycle 24x 76 years to 544 BC
96x 19 year moon). So the moon was calculated from Arpaxad
(Noah's 2368 BC year 602) in 544 BC for Buddha.
This could be where Josephus comes up with support from those who
say Arpaxad was 12 years after the Flood not 2 years presuming he
wouldnt have written that unless there were those who said it.
1 year Flood +12 years +(153x 19 year moon)
=2920 = 2x 1460

Another correlation of confusion for Buddha could be that of
Hamurabi making himself king of kings when Nimrod (Narmer)
died in Egypt in 1770 BC (Adam's year 2256). Thats began
the calendar holidays to count 3744 years to year 6000.
The Maya still have this 3744 years... the Flood as 3114 BC
as year 2256 plus 3744 to a Christ king in 630 AD.... all years
being just an 8-year Venus difference from Moslem Flood 3122 BC
and Moslem Leader 622 AD. THIS 3744 IS DIVIDED BY UNITS OF
312 WHICH WERE KNOWN IN 312 BC AND TO MAGI AND IN 312 AD.
Now because Babylon's Hamurabi created this 312-year calendar count
(along with Egypt) would it then be of any surprise that a count for 312
from his 1770 BC to 834 BC (3x 312 Marduk temple revival) to 522 BC
Darius as king of kings
(when Hamurabi declares himself as the New Nimrod king of kings)
would be mistaken as a count of 312 from his kingship 1792 BC
to 544 BC.

THE BIBLE  warns us.  Make sure of all things, and hold fast to
what you discover to be true and refined. 4000 years has proven
chronologers to be at a maximum negligence and incompetence.
Few are those who actually value truth as a precision that must be
tested many times. This doesnt mean a RITUAL of setting it up 100
times will declare it scientific fact, because ritual cannot be blind
and come up with truth just because its done 100 or 1000 times.
There is always the true illusions which allow human delusions.
So people can see what they wish to, and not what truly is.
The Christ is here when the truth comes out, those who fight it
will die, when those who flee the proper hour then live.
Predicting that hour must be done NOW, or all will die.
I personally no longer know whether i would want everyone to die
or not, teaching is not easy, and frustration makes you bitter.
That is why i know i am the warning, the threat, not the Christ
who will act on what i know. I am John, not Jesus, and they all
wish to know why i do not follow the one i came to declare
as the Leader. Kings have been crowned by the Pope, but would
the Pope ever allow me to baptize him. Jesus would.